ediverse Explore the platform

Spotlight PEPPOL BIS Billing 3.0 The EU e-invoicing mandate is here — France Sept 2026, Belgium Jan 2026, Germany 2025.
PARTIN D.05A

PARTIN — EDIFACT Party Information Message (D.05A)

The PARTIN message conveys the master data of a trade partner: commercial identifiers, contact details, billing and shipping addresses, banking and tax information. It is used to initialise or update EDI partner directories. This page summarises the segment structure as published by UN/CEFACT for directory D.05A.

Purpose

The PARTIN message conveys the master data of a trade partner: commercial identifiers, contact details, billing and shipping addresses, banking and tax information. It is used to initialise or update EDI partner directories.

This page focuses on the structure published by UN/CEFACT for directory D.05A. The segments listed, their status (M / C), position and repetition factor are extracted from the official file partin_c.htm hosted on service.unece.org.

Segment structure

The PARTIN D.05A message has 13 header entries, 52 detail entries and 0 summary entries (segments and groups combined). Groups are shown in bold and their members are indented by actual nesting depth.

Pos.TagNameSRep.
0010UNHMessage headerM1
0020BGMBeginning of messageM1
0030DTMDate/time/periodM×5
0040FIIFinancial institution informationC×10
0050FTXFree textC×5
0060  SG1Group (×5)C×5
0070  RFFReferenceM1
0080  DTMDate/time/periodC1
0090    SG2Group (×2)C×2
0100    NADName and addressM1
0110      SG3Group (×5)C×5
0120      CTAContact informationM1
0130      COMCommunication contactC×5

Detail

Pos.TagNameSRep.
0140UNSSection controlM1
0150  SG4Group (×200000)C×200000
0160  NADName and addressM1
0170  DTMDate/time/periodC×5
0180  FIIFinancial institution informationC×10
0190  IDEIdentityC×9
0200  FTXFree textC×9
0210  TAXDuty/tax/fee detailsC×9
0220  HYNHierarchy informationC×9
0230    SG5Group (×99)C×99
0240    LOCPlace/location identificationM1
0250    DTMDate/time/periodC×2
0260      SG6Group (×15)C×15
0270      RFFReferenceM1
0280      DTMDate/time/periodC1
0290        SG7Group (×5)C×5
0300        CTAContact informationM1
0310        COMCommunication contactC×5
0320          SG8Group (×10)C×10
0330          SCCScheduling conditionsM1
0340          DTMDate/time/periodC×2
0350            SG9Group (×1)C1
0360            TODTerms of delivery or transportM1
0370            LOCPlace/location identificationC1
0380              SG10Group (×999)C×999
0390              PAIPayment instructionsM1
0400              PYTPayment termsC1
0410              CUXCurrenciesC×2
0420              DTMDate/time/periodC×9
0430              PCDPercentage detailsC×9
0440              MOAMonetary amountC×9
0450                SG11Group (×999)C×999
0460                RCSRequirements and conditionsM1
0470                MOAMonetary amountC×9
0480                QTYQuantityC×9
0490                  SG12Group (×999)C×999
0500                  CCICharacteristic/class idM1
0510                  MOAMonetary amountC×9
0520                  QTYQuantityC×9
0530                  CAVCharacteristic valueC×9
0540                  DTMDate/time/periodC×9
0550                  MEAMeasurementsC×9
0560                    SG13Group (×999)C×999
0570                    PRCProcess identificationM1
0580                    DTMDate/time/periodC×9
0590                      SG14Group (×999)C×999
0600                      LINLine itemM1
0610                      NADName and addressM1
0620                        SG15Group (×99)M×99
0630                        DOCDocument/message detailsM1
0640                        DTMDate/time/periodC×9
0650UNTMessage trailerM1

Summary

No segment in this section.

Changes vs D.96A

Top-level differences between D.96A and D.05A for the PARTIN message (segments directly inside header / detail / summary, ignoring nested groups). The comparison is indicative: a given tag may have evolved inside nested groups without showing up in this synthesis.

Segments added vs D.96A

  • IDE in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • FTX in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • TAX in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • HYN in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • PYT in the detail section (status C, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • PCD in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • MOA in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • RCS in the detail section (status M, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • QTY in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • CCI in the detail section (status M, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • CAV in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • MEA in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • PRC in the detail section (status M, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • LIN in the detail section (status M, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • DOC in the detail section (status M, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.

Segments removed vs D.96A

  • PAT in the detail section — present in D.96A but missing in D.05A at the same level.

Structural example

Minimal example of an PARTIN D.05A message with mandatory segments only. The goal is to show the exact version declared in UNH (PARTIN:D:05A:UN) — not to replicate a full business case (see the PARTIN D.96A page for an annotated example).

edifact partin-d05a-example.edi
UNB+UNOC:3+5410000000123:14+5410000000456:14+260514:1430+CTRL005001'
UNH+1+PARTIN:D:05A:UN'
BGM+23+PARTIN-2026-0301+9'
DTM+137:20260514:102'
NAD+BY+5410000000123::9++EDIVERSE SAS+10 RUE DE PARIS+PARIS++75001+FR'
CTA+IC+:Pierre Martin'
COM+pierre.martin@example.com:EM'
FII+BF+FR7630001007941234567890185:CCBPFRPPVER:25'
UNT+7+1'
UNZ+1+CTRL005001'

Common errors

  • Misaligned UNH tokens — The UNH+...+PARTIN:D:05A:UN token must reflect exactly the directory in use — a mismatch between the UNH release and the release agreed with the partner is rejected by every strict validator.
  • Wrong UNT segment count — The value after UNT+ must include UNH and UNT themselves. By far the most common sender-side error, regardless of the directory in use.
  • Stale code lists — Between D.96A and D.05A, several code lists received new qualifiers (DTM status, RFF qualifier, NAD codes…). Reusing an older directory’s code tables triggers warnings or even rejections depending on the partner’s strict-conformance mode.

Other versions of this message available on ediverse.io: PARTIN D.96A, PARTIN D.01B, PARTIN D.10A, PARTIN D.16B, PARTIN D.21B, PARTIN D.24A, PARTIN D.97A, PARTIN D.99B, PARTIN D.00B, PARTIN D.02B, PARTIN D.08A, PARTIN D.13B, PARTIN D.18B, PARTIN D.20B.

X12 functional equivalent: X12 838.

← All EDIFACT versions