ediverse Explore the platform

Spotlight PEPPOL BIS Billing 3.0 The EU e-invoicing mandate is here — France Sept 2026, Belgium Jan 2026, Germany 2025.
PARTIN D.18B

PARTIN — EDIFACT Party Information Message (D.18B)

The PARTIN message conveys the master data of a trade partner: commercial identifiers, contact details, billing and shipping addresses, banking and tax information. It is used to initialise or update EDI partner directories. This page summarises the segment structure as published by UN/CEFACT for directory D.18B.

Purpose

The PARTIN message conveys the master data of a trade partner: commercial identifiers, contact details, billing and shipping addresses, banking and tax information. It is used to initialise or update EDI partner directories.

This page focuses on the structure published by UN/CEFACT for directory D.18B. The segments listed, their status (M / C), position and repetition factor are extracted from the official file partin_c.htm hosted on service.unece.org.

Segment structure

The PARTIN D.18B message has 13 header entries, 52 detail entries and 0 summary entries (segments and groups combined). Groups are shown in bold and their members are indented by actual nesting depth.

Pos.TagNameSRep.
00010UNHMessage headerM1
00020BGMBeginning of messageM1
00030DTMDate/time/periodM×5
00040FIIFinancial institution informationC×10
00050FTXFree textC×5
00060  SG1Group (×5)C×5
00070  RFFReferenceM1
00080  DTMDate/time/periodC1
00090    SG2Group (×2)C×2
00100    NADName and addressM1
00110      SG3Group (×5)C×5
00120      CTAContact informationM1
00130      COMCommunication contactC×5

Detail

Pos.TagNameSRep.
00140UNSSection controlM1
00150  SG4Group (×200000)C×200000
00160  NADName and addressM1
00170  DTMDate/time/periodC×5
00180  FIIFinancial institution informationC×10
00190  IDEIdentityC×9
00200  FTXFree textC×9
00210  TAXDuty/tax/fee detailsC×9
00220  HYNHierarchy informationC×9
00230    SG5Group (×99)C×99
00240    LOCPlace/location identificationM1
00250    DTMDate/time/periodC×2
00260      SG6Group (×15)C×15
00270      RFFReferenceM1
00280      DTMDate/time/periodC1
00290        SG7Group (×5)C×5
00300        CTAContact informationM1
00310        COMCommunication contactC×5
00320          SG8Group (×10)C×10
00330          SCCScheduling conditionsM1
00340          DTMDate/time/periodC×2
00350            SG9Group (×1)C1
00360            TODTerms of delivery or transportM1
00370            LOCPlace/location identificationC1
00380              SG10Group (×999)C×999
00390              PAIPayment instructionsM1
00400              PYTPayment termsC1
00410              CUXCurrenciesC×2
00420              DTMDate/time/periodC×9
00430              PCDPercentage detailsC×9
00440              MOAMonetary amountC×9
00450                SG11Group (×999)C×999
00460                RCSRequirements and conditionsM1
00470                MOAMonetary amountC×9
00480                QTYQuantityC×9
00490                  SG12Group (×999)C×999
00500                  CCICharacteristic/class idM1
00510                  MOAMonetary amountC×9
00520                  QTYQuantityC×9
00530                  CAVCharacteristic valueC×9
00540                  DTMDate/time/periodC×9
00550                  MEAMeasurementsC×9
00560                    SG13Group (×999)C×999
00570                    PRCProcess identificationM1
00580                    DTMDate/time/periodC×9
00590                      SG14Group (×999)C×999
00600                      LINLine itemM1
00610                      NADName and addressM1
00620                        SG15Group (×99)M×99
00630                        DOCDocument/message detailsM1
00640                        DTMDate/time/periodC×9
00650UNTMessage trailerM1

Summary

No segment in this section.

Changes vs D.96A

Top-level differences between D.96A and D.18B for the PARTIN message (segments directly inside header / detail / summary, ignoring nested groups). The comparison is indicative: a given tag may have evolved inside nested groups without showing up in this synthesis.

Segments added vs D.96A

  • IDE in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • FTX in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • TAX in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • HYN in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • PYT in the detail section (status C, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • PCD in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • MOA in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • RCS in the detail section (status M, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • QTY in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • CCI in the detail section (status M, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • CAV in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • MEA in the detail section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • PRC in the detail section (status M, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • LIN in the detail section (status M, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • DOC in the detail section (status M, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.

Segments removed vs D.96A

  • PAT in the detail section — present in D.96A but missing in D.18B at the same level.

Structural example

Minimal example of an PARTIN D.18B message with mandatory segments only. The goal is to show the exact version declared in UNH (PARTIN:D:18B:UN) — not to replicate a full business case (see the PARTIN D.96A page for an annotated example).

edifact partin-d18b-example.edi
UNB+UNOC:3+5410000000123:14+5410000000456:14+260514:1430+CTRL018001'
UNH+1+PARTIN:D:18B:UN'
BGM+23+PARTIN-2026-0301+9'
DTM+137:20260514:102'
NAD+BY+5410000000123::9++EDIVERSE SAS+10 RUE DE PARIS+PARIS++75001+FR'
CTA+IC+:Pierre Martin'
COM+pierre.martin@example.com:EM'
FII+BF+FR7630001007941234567890185:CCBPFRPPVER:25'
UNT+7+1'
UNZ+1+CTRL018001'

Common errors

  • Misaligned UNH tokens — The UNH+...+PARTIN:D:18B:UN token must reflect exactly the directory in use — a mismatch between the UNH release and the release agreed with the partner is rejected by every strict validator.
  • Wrong UNT segment count — The value after UNT+ must include UNH and UNT themselves. By far the most common sender-side error, regardless of the directory in use.
  • Stale code lists — Between D.96A and D.18B, several code lists received new qualifiers (DTM status, RFF qualifier, NAD codes…). Reusing an older directory’s code tables triggers warnings or even rejections depending on the partner’s strict-conformance mode.

Other versions of this message available on ediverse.io: PARTIN D.96A, PARTIN D.01B, PARTIN D.10A, PARTIN D.16B, PARTIN D.21B, PARTIN D.24A, PARTIN D.97A, PARTIN D.99B, PARTIN D.00B, PARTIN D.02B, PARTIN D.05A, PARTIN D.08A, PARTIN D.13B, PARTIN D.20B.

X12 functional equivalent: X12 838.

← All EDIFACT versions