ediverse Explore the platform

Spotlight PEPPOL BIS Billing 3.0 The EU e-invoicing mandate is here — France Sept 2026, Belgium Jan 2026, Germany 2025.
JOBAPP D.10A

JOBAPP — EDIFACT Job Application Proposal Message (D.10A)

The JOBAPP message is the application to a vacant job sent by a job-seeker — directly or via an agency — to an employer or to a public employment service: it carries the candidate identification, work history, qualifications, expectations and reference to the related vacancy. This page summarises the segment structure as published by UN/CEFACT for directory D.10A.

Purpose

The JOBAPP message is the application to a vacant job sent by a job-seeker — directly or via an agency — to an employer or to a public employment service: it carries the candidate identification, work history, qualifications, expectations and reference to the related vacancy.

This page focuses on the structure published by UN/CEFACT for directory D.10A. The segments listed, their status (M / C), position and repetition factor are extracted from the official file jobapp_c.htm hosted on service.unece.org.

Segment structure

The JOBAPP D.10A message has 17 header entries, 41 detail entries and 0 summary entries (segments and groups combined). Groups are shown in bold and their members are indented by actual nesting depth.

Pos.TagNameSRep.
0010UNHMessage headerM1
0020BGMBeginning of messageM1
0030DTMDate/time/periodM×2
0040  SG1Group (×99)M×99
0050  PNAParty identificationM1
0060  ADRAddressC1
0070  LOCPlace/location identificationC×5
0080  DTMDate/time/periodC×5
0090    SG2Group (×5)C×5
0100    CTAContact informationM1
0110    COMCommunication contactC×5
0120      SG3Group (×5)C×5
0130      RFFReferenceM1
0140      DTMDate/time/periodC×5
0150        SG4Group (×5)C×5
0160        GEIProcessing informationM1
0170        FTXFree textC1

Detail

Pos.TagNameSRep.
0180UNSSection controlM1
0190  SG5Group (×999)M×999
0200  RFFReferenceM1
0210  DTMDate/time/periodC×99
0220    SG6Group (×1)C1
0230    PNAParty identificationM1
0240    DTMDate/time/periodC1
0250    LOCPlace/location identificationC×9
0260    NATNationalityC×9
0270    PDIPerson demographic informationC1
0280    DOCDocument/message detailsC×9
0290      SG7Group (×5)C×5
0300      GEIProcessing informationM1
0310      FTXFree textC1
0320        SG8Group (×99)M×99
0330        RCSRequirements and conditionsM1
0340        FTXFree textC×99
0350          SG9Group (×1)C1
0360          SALRemuneration type identificationM1
0370          FTXFree textC1
0380            SG10Group (×10)C×10
0390            ATTAttributeM1
0400            FTXFree textC1
0410              SG11Group (×2)C×2
0420              GEIProcessing informationM1
0430              FTXFree textC1
0440                SG12Group (×5)C×5
0450                MOAMonetary amountM1
0460                RNGRange detailsC1
0470                FTXFree textC1
0480                  SG13Group (×1)M1
0490                  EMPEmployment detailsM1
0500                  LOCPlace/location identificationC1
0510                    SG14Group (×100)C×100
0520                    ATTAttributeM1
0530                    FTXFree textC1
0540                    PTYPriorityC1
0550                      SG15Group (×20)C×20
0560                      LANLanguageM1
0570                      GEIProcessing informationC×3
0580UNTMessage trailerM1

Summary

No segment in this section.

Changes vs D.96A

Top-level differences between D.96A and D.10A for the JOBAPP message (segments directly inside header / detail / summary, ignoring nested groups). The comparison is indicative: a given tag may have evolved inside nested groups without showing up in this synthesis.

Segments added vs D.96A

  • GEI in the header section (status M, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
  • GEI in the detail section (status M, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.

Segments removed vs D.96A

  • GIS in the header section — present in D.96A but missing in D.10A at the same level.
  • GIS in the detail section — present in D.96A but missing in D.10A at the same level.

Structural example

Minimal example of an JOBAPP D.10A message with mandatory segments only. The goal is to show the exact version declared in UNH (JOBAPP:D:10A:UN) — not to replicate a full business case (see the JOBAPP D.96A page for an annotated example).

edifact jobapp-d10a-example.edi
UNB+UNOC:3+5410000000123:14+5410000000456:14+260514:1430+CTRL010001'
UNH+1+JOBAPP:D:10A:UN'
BGM+316+JOBAPP-2026-0042+9'
DTM+137:20260514:102'
RFF+AHI:VAC-2026-7811'
PNA+APP+CAND-2026-0042::ZZZ+++SU:DUPONT+FN:CLAIRE'
ADR+CD+++75001:PARIS:::FR'
COM+claire.dupont@example.com:EM'
NAD+EM+5410000000456::9'
UNT+9+1'
UNZ+1+CTRL010001'

Common errors

  • Misaligned UNH tokens — The UNH+...+JOBAPP:D:10A:UN token must reflect exactly the directory in use — a mismatch between the UNH release and the release agreed with the partner is rejected by every strict validator.
  • Wrong UNT segment count — The value after UNT+ must include UNH and UNT themselves. By far the most common sender-side error, regardless of the directory in use.
  • Stale code lists — Between D.96A and D.10A, several code lists received new qualifiers (DTM status, RFF qualifier, NAD codes…). Reusing an older directory’s code tables triggers warnings or even rejections depending on the partner’s strict-conformance mode.

Other versions of this message available on ediverse.io: JOBAPP D.96A, JOBAPP D.01B, JOBAPP D.16B, JOBAPP D.21B, JOBAPP D.24A, JOBAPP D.97A, JOBAPP D.99B, JOBAPP D.00B, JOBAPP D.02B, JOBAPP D.05A, JOBAPP D.08A, JOBAPP D.13B, JOBAPP D.18B, JOBAPP D.20B.

← All EDIFACT versions