ediverse Explore the platform

Spotlight PEPPOL BIS Billing 3.0 The EU e-invoicing mandate is here — France Sept 2026, Belgium Jan 2026, Germany 2025.
CALINF D.96A

CALINF — EDIFACT Call for Information Message (D.96A)

The CALINF message is the formal information request sent to a trade partner: it identifies the subject, scope and urgency of the information requested (stock level, order status, account value, container position). It is a generic channel that complements dedicated query messages (INVRPT, IFTSTA…) when none fits. This page summarises the segment structure as published by UN/CEFACT for directory D.96A.

Purpose

The CALINF message is the formal information request sent to a trade partner: it identifies the subject, scope and urgency of the information requested (stock level, order status, account value, container position). It is a generic channel that complements dedicated query messages (INVRPT, IFTSTA…) when none fits.

This page focuses on the structure published by UN/CEFACT for directory D.96A. The segments listed, their status (M / C), position and repetition factor are extracted from the official file calinf_s.htm hosted on service.unece.org.

Segment structure

The CALINF D.96A message has 16 header entries, 0 detail entries and 0 summary entries (segments and groups combined). Groups are shown in bold and their members are indented by actual nesting depth.

Pos.TagNameSRep.
0010UNHMessage headerM1
0020BGMBeginning of messageM1
0030RFFReferenceC×9
0040  SG1Group (×9)M×9
0050  NADName and addressM1
0060  CTAContact informationC×9
0070    SG2Group (×1)M1
0080    TDTDetails of transportM1
0090    RFFReferenceC×9
0100    LOCPlace/location identificationM×9
0110    DTMDate/time/periodM×9
0120    FTXFree textC×9
0130      SG3Group (×9)C×9
0140      QTYQuantityM1
0150      FTXFree textC1
0160UNTMessage trailerM1

Detail

No segment in this section.

Summary

No segment in this section.

Changes vs D.96A

This page documents directory D.96A itself: it serves as the reference for every other version of the message. The synthesis below describes the structural changes that later directories will introduce relative to it.

No top-level differences detected between D.96A and D.96A for this message. Differences are then limited to nested groups and code lists.

Structural example

Minimal example of an CALINF D.96A message with mandatory segments only. The goal is to show the exact version declared in UNH (CALINF:D:96A:UN) — not to replicate a full business case.

edifact calinf-d96a-example.edi
UNB+UNOC:3+5410000000123:14+5410000000456:14+260514:1430+CTRL096001'
UNH+1+CALINF:D:96A:UN'
BGM+705+CALINF-2026-0731+9'
DTM+137:20260514:102'
FTX+AAI+++Request stock level for SKU 3520000001234 - DC PARIS NORTH'
RFF+ON:ORDER789'
NAD+MS+5410000000123::9'
NAD+MR+5410000000456::9'
LIN+1++3520000001234:EN'
UNT+9+1'
UNZ+1+CTRL096001'

Common errors

  • Misaligned UNH tokens — The UNH+...+CALINF:D:96A:UN token must reflect exactly the directory in use — a mismatch between the UNH release and the release agreed with the partner is rejected by every strict validator.
  • Wrong UNT segment count — The value after UNT+ must include UNH and UNT themselves. By far the most common sender-side error, regardless of the directory in use.
  • Stale code lists — Between D.96A and D.96A, several code lists received new qualifiers (DTM status, RFF qualifier, NAD codes…). Reusing an older directory’s code tables triggers warnings or even rejections depending on the partner’s strict-conformance mode.

Other versions of this message available on ediverse.io: CALINF D.01B, CALINF D.10A, CALINF D.16B, CALINF D.21B, CALINF D.24A, CALINF D.97A, CALINF D.99B, CALINF D.00B, CALINF D.02B, CALINF D.05A, CALINF D.08A, CALINF D.13B, CALINF D.18B, CALINF D.20B.

← All EDIFACT versions