ediverse Explore the platform

Spotlight PEPPOL BIS Billing 3.0 The EU e-invoicing mandate is here — France Sept 2026, Belgium Jan 2026, Germany 2025.

ADT^A24 — Link Patient Information

Two records appear to belong to the same patient, but a merge is not yet warranted: A24 creates a soft link, awaiting manual validation by identity vigilance.

Purpose

Typical case: probabilistic MPI matching that crosses a threshold without reaching certainty. Rather than blindly merging (A18/A40), the EMPI emits A24 to hold the records for human review by identity vigilance. No data is moved. The link will be promoted to A18/A40 if validated, or lifted by A37 (Unlink Patient Information) if disproven.

Segment structure

Structure ADT_A24: MSH, EVN, two PID blocks (linked patients), PD1 and PV1 optional.

Real-world example

MRN567890 and MRN567899 share name, given name and birth date — possible duplicate:

plaintext adt-a24-example.hl7
MSH|^~\&|HIS|HOSP01|EHR|CLINIC02|20260516162000||ADT^A24^ADT_A24|MSG00024001|P|2.5.1|||AL|NE
EVN|A24|20260516162000|||DRJONES^Jones^Sarah^^^DR.|SUSPECTED DUPLICATE - PENDING REVIEW
PID|1||MRN567890^^^HOSP^MR||DOE^JOHN^A^^MR.||19720515|M
PID|2||MRN567899^^^HOSP^MR||DOE^JOHN^A^^MR.||19720515|M

Acknowledgment (ACK)

plaintext ack-a24-example.hl7
MSH|^~\&|EHR|CLINIC02|HIS|HOSP01|20260516162001||ACK^A24^ACK|ACK00024001|P|2.5.1
MSA|AA|MSG00024001

Common errors

  • A24 / A18 confusion: A24 erases NOTHING, it only signals. If the receiving EHR treats A24 as A18, a legitimate patient's identity can be lost.
  • EVN-4 missing: no justification = no audit. Always provide the cause (MPI score, user request).
  • A24 then silence: the link must be resolved (A18 merge validated OR A37 link lifted). Otherwise records are in limbo.
CodeTrigger eventDescription
A18Merge Patient InformationValidated merge.
A24Link Patient InformationThis page.
A37Unlink Patient InformationLink lifted (false positive).
A40Merge Patient ID ListModern merge.

See also: ADT^A18.