IFTSTA — EDIFACT Multimodal Transport Status Message (D.24A)

The IFTSTA message conveys multimodal-shipment statuses from a carrier or 3PL to the trade parties: key events (departure, arrival, hub, customs), geolocation and exceptions. This page summarises the segment structure as published by UN/CEFACT for directory D.24A.

Purpose

The IFTSTA message conveys multimodal-shipment statuses from a carrier or 3PL to the trade parties: key events (departure, arrival, hub, customs), geolocation and exceptions.

This page focuses on the structure published by UN/CEFACT for directory D.24A. The segments listed, their status (M / C), position and repetition factor are extracted from the official file iftsta_c.htm hosted on service.unece.org.

Segment structure

The IFTSTA D.24A message has 120 header entries, 0 detail entries and 0 summary entries (segments and groups combined). Groups are shown in bold and their members are indented by actual nesting depth.

Header

Detail

No segment in this section.

Summary

No segment in this section.

Changes vs D.96A

Top-level differences between D.96A and D.24A for the IFTSTA message (segments directly inside header / detail / summary, ignoring nested groups). The comparison is indicative: a given tag may have evolved inside nested groups without showing up in this synthesis.

Segments added vs D.96A

• TPL in the header section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
• TMD in the header section (status C, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
• DGS in the header section (status M, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
• QTY in the header section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
• TMP in the header section (status M, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
• RNG in the header section (status C, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
• DAM in the header section (status M, repeat ×1) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
• COD in the header section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
• SGP in the header section (status C, repeat ×99) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.
• GDS in the header section (status C, repeat ×9) — not present at the top of the corresponding D.96A section.

Max-repeat changes

• GIN (header): repeat ×9 in D.96A → ×9999 in D.24A.

Structural example

Minimal example of an IFTSTA D.24A message with mandatory segments only. The goal is to show the exact version declared in UNH (IFTSTA:D:24A:UN) — not to replicate a full business case (see the IFTSTA D.96A page for an annotated example).

UNB+UNOC:3+5410000000123:14+5410000000456:14+260514:1430+CTRL024001'
UNH+1+IFTSTA:D:24A:UN'
BGM+77+STA-2026-1042+9'
DTM+137:202605141430:203'
NAD+CA+5410000000123::9'
CNI+1'
STS+1++1'
RFF+CN:CMR-9981'
DTM+334:202605141000:203'
LOC+175+FRPAR::6'
UNT+10+1'
UNZ+1+CTRL024001'

Common errors

• Misaligned UNH tokens — The UNH+...+IFTSTA:D:24A:UN token must reflect exactly the directory in use — a mismatch between the UNH release and the release agreed with the partner is rejected by every strict validator.
• Wrong UNT segment count — The value after UNT+ must include UNH and UNT themselves. By far the most common sender-side error, regardless of the directory in use.
• Stale code lists — Between D.96A and D.24A, several code lists received new qualifiers (DTM status, RFF qualifier, NAD codes…). Reusing an older directory’s code tables triggers warnings or even rejections depending on the partner’s strict-conformance mode.

Related messages

Other versions of this message available on ediverse.io: IFTSTA D.96A, IFTSTA D.01B, IFTSTA D.10A, IFTSTA D.16B, IFTSTA D.21B, IFTSTA D.97A, IFTSTA D.99B, IFTSTA D.00B, IFTSTA D.02B, IFTSTA D.05A, IFTSTA D.08A, IFTSTA D.13B, IFTSTA D.18B, IFTSTA D.20B.

X12 functional equivalent: X12 214.

← All EDIFACT versions